National Coalition to Save Our Mall
view  view         

Home  •   Search  •   Newsletter/Archive  •   Contact Us   



DONATE

ABOUT THE COALITION
LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT
   NEW October 2008

HISTORY AND RESOURCES
• Mall Maps
• Illustrated History
• Future of the Mall VIDEO
• 1902 McMillan Commission   Report

NATIONAL MALL THIRD CENTURY INITIATIVE

NATIONAL MALL CONSERVANCY

ANNUAL REPORTS
• 2006 Annual Report (PDF)
• 2005 Annual Report (PDF)

GREAT MOMENTS
PHOTO GALLERY
• Who's in Charge?

THE MALL CHRONICLES
• Media Coverage
• Analysis
• Coalition Testimony
• Letters

THE WWII MEMORIAL
• WWII Memorial Archive

WASHINGTON MONUMENT
• Washington Monument Archive  Updated 8/8/2008

U.S. CAPITOL

THREATS & TREATS
ACT NOW
• What You Can Do
• Contribute

WHO WE ARE
WWII Veterans
PRESSROOM
Detailed Search



Changing Face

A Failed Process

Thus, at every turn, the existing process has failed or been thwarted. A public process has been stymied. Historic preservation has been ignored. Attempts to assure a memorial that properly honors WWII while also respecting the Mall have been abandoned. Once the CFA proposed and then approved the Mall site, and then later when the ABMC kept on with the architect of a rejected design, one agency after another eventually fell into line. The result in this case is a memorial that is a marriage of poor design, expediency, and neglect. It is the formal triumphalist military vision of the ABMC wedded to the security and crowd-control needs of the National Park Service and Park Police.

It is further abetted by federal agencies beholden to the political climates in which they operate. President Clinton rushed to dedicate the Rainbow Pool site on Veterans Day 1995 and he is now planning to break ground on the WWII Memorial on Veterans Day of this year. ABMC only argues that it must be rushed to completion before all the WWII veterans die.

Why all this has occurred is another matter entirely. Certainly the veterans lobby has played a part, as Senator Bob Kerrey (D-NE) sadly discovered when he first led the opposition to the site in 1997. Equally important is the fact that the $100 million is being solicited from private funding sources with the help of Hollywood and multi-million-dollar corporations playing influential roles. Congressional oversight might have been more vigorous had public funds been involved, one could hopefully assume.

Next: In conclusion ...



Back to the top

ANALYSIS & COMMENTARY
• Needed: A National Mall Conservancy
• Changing Face of the National Public Space
• Memories & Mishaps
• Dead End for the Freedom Trail?
• This Singular Space: Against the Memorial
• Media Coverage & Commentary
• Public Testimonials
• Mall Watch
• Additional Resources on the Web
  and more ...

TESTIMONY/COMMENTS
• March 26, 2007, NPS Mall Plan: Additional Comments by the NPCA
• March 12, 2007, NPS Mall Plan: Comments by Save Our Mall
• January 15, 2007, NPS Mall Plan: Comments by Guild of Professional Tour Guides
• December 26, 2006, NPS Mall Plan: Comments by the NPCA
• August 3, 2006: Vietnam Veterans Memorial Center project
• October 6, 2005: Vietnam Veterans Memorial Center project
• July 21, 2005: Commission of Fine Arts on Lincoln Memorial Security
• April 12, 2005: The Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee Subcommittee on National Parks
• March 17, 2005: Lincoln Memorial Security/ CFA

LETTERS
• April 12, 2005: The Honorable Craig Thomas, Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, United States Senate

MEDIA COVERAGE
• Washington Monument Security
• World War II Memorial
• Vietnam Veterans Education Center
• African American History Museum
  and more ...

Copyright © 2008 National Coalition to Save Our Mall Inc. All Rights Reserved